List given to Paula by Alison
|15/01/20||Buck||He (Mr Palmer) very obviously let me assume I was talking her new Office Manager. He did not inform me that you, her actual office manager was listening in. Please let me have any copy of the recording of what was said so that I can check it against the length of my call for any editing.
You will see from the first attachment that the Council have not been honest with either Emma, Angela or myself. You will see from the second attachment that that I have already sought legal advice and Mr Tilbury suggested that we should first ask the Council about misleading the Ombudsman and then approach the Ombudsman and this I did.
|I can confirm that UK Docks did not submit an application for the Council for retrospective planning and the email I sent to Councillor Hamilton I have copied to a PDF file and attached it. She may be able to help you with the legal points you wish to raise. I have a dispute with Mrs Johnson about the misinformation/misrepresentation given to the Local Government Ombudsman. I agree with Mr Tilbury of Peter Dunn & co but she maintains that there is no evidence of any. I sent you both a copy of his advice yesterday because Mr Palmer alluded to vexatious communications.|
|17/01/20||Todd||Remember trying to revive the Tyne Gateway because the Council would not speak to us and the MP’s Office appeared to be unwilling to help. The Council, still, will not talk to us because they cannot admit that we were correct when we complained that the shed was too high and they then misinformed the Ombudsman to cover up the misuse of their own complaints procedure.|
|23/01/20||Palmer||You seem to have done some homework before our phone call on Monday the 13th but if you had paid attention to the facts rather than opinions based on fraudulent misrepresentations you would have come to the conclusion that UK Dock’s shed is 3 meters taller than planned. This can be confirmed by examination of the authorised drawing 8296/2|
|31/03/20||Robason||I’d like to emphasise that when I gave my personal details to Mr Buck I did it in good faith and said I would talk over phone to Mr Palmer about the corruption with UK Docks.
I should not have talked over the phone but the pair of them hooked me with the bait that we could talk honestly about UK Docks. If Mr Palmer’s intentions were honourable he would have told me that that Mr Buck was listening to the call as well. The Message I got from Mr Palmer was that he actually wanted to close down any dialogue about UK Docks which reminded me of one of the first written communications from Peter Cunningham, Principal Planning Officer, Fri, 20 Dec 2013:
|A warning to Nicola Robason that we were dealing with another extremely dishonest/devious person.|
Cc: Lewell-Buck MP
|You appear to be new to your post and so I given you some background to the Council’s early responses to our complaint that the shed was taller and wider than permitted.
That is she has must have been told that no laws have been broken and that might be true but to say but to mean that she shed is built to the approved plans is fraudulent misrepresentation. Emma met with UK Docks again on March 1st 2019 and we have an account provided by Cllr Hamilton who attended as well and this time there is no mention of broken laws. Not long after the visit UK Docks were putting it about that they had been granted permission retrospectively for the shed we now see.
|24/02/20||Buck||I wrote to you on the 24th January thanking you for removing the block from mick dawson at theharbourview.co.uk so that my copy to Emma did not bounce from her mailbox at parliament.uk.
I notice that it has been reinstated, 20-Jan-20 and it is likely she will not have seen the email nor the two attachments, ‘Destroying Evidence’ and ‘Dishonesty at the Town Hall’. I have not attached them to this email to you as Mr Parker will be able to forward a copy of my email and attachments to both you and Emma when he returns to work today the 24th.
|Robason||Re: Complaint: 248789 – Unplanned Development on River Drive
The question remains why did they tell Councillor Hamilton and the MP for South Shields some time in March or April 2019 that they had permission for their shed. If you look at the background. . . . sentence not completed.
|Very obviously sent in error||Response sent at 09:00 – I note the emails sent to me and copied to me dated 31 January and 24 February. I confirm that Mr. Harding has now retired from the Council, which is why his email won’t be active. My email dated 19 December 2019 set out my position on this matter. It remains the case that all complaints procedures relating to this matter have been exhausted both internally within the Council and externally.|
|Fwd: UK Dock’s Slipway Enclosure and STC Council.
Thank you both for your emails this morning before you go any further I suggest you both read what I said to the Monitoring Officer (Mr Harding) and what lead (to it). Note that he, Mr Harding I believe at that time, never even acknowledged the receipt of it.
I shall be responding to you both in due course and until Mr Palmer removes me from the blacklist that he has created I keep on repeating to all that his actions remind me more of coercive control than anything else.
The First Email to NR on the 26th was titled Re: Complaint: 248789 – Unplanned Development on River Drive and it was no longer relevant so a one was needed but while attempting to change the Subject to Fwd: UK Dock’s Slipway Enclosure and STC Council, it got sent by mistake.
Threat issued by Mr Buck 26-Feb-20.