Unbelievable III – STC have accepted an application for a bigger shed.

next to the unplanned one.

and when you ask them to ask for it to be withdrawn you will get something like that shown below. To see how this ends.


From: Performance and Information Support Officer
To: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 12:19 PM
Subject: RE FBR – 266782, Planning application ST/0461/14/FUL

Dear Mr Dawson
I am writing in regard to your recent feedback request 266782, and the planning application ST/0461/14/FUL.
I have spoken to our planning department and they have advised that past issues do not affect the validity of any new planning applications and as such it is going through the normal planning process. We would not ask that it be withdrawn.

If I can be of any further help please get in touch.

Kind Regards
Performance and Information Support Officer
Strategy and Performance

Unbelievable II – STC won’t enforce conditions

Not really – they can’t enforce conditions on an unplanned building.

South Tyneside Council say they cannot enforce any conditions of the original grant of planning permission because the shed/shelter/cover is built without planning permission. In brief:

That the doors must be closed when they are working on vessels in the shed and they must give advance notice if they want to work outside the conditioned hours.  (a picture here, of the Shields Ferry with its rear end poking some 3m out of the back end of the shed would be nice).

The Council (South Tyneside) allowed the shed to be built because they said that there was not sufficient material deviation from the approved plan to warrant the building work to be stopped. It had been pointed out to the Council by protesters from day 4 of the construction that the shed appeared to be too high. It took a further 5 months prove the validity of the protesters case but the Head of Development Services overrode this, still maintaining that there was insufficient difference from the approved plans to stop the work and still saying this when the shed was signed off in June 2014, 9 months after the frames first went up. Quote (from stage II complaint 253539, 2nd June 2014):
“I have investigated this and referred to the approved drawing cross-referenced with the dimensions taken on site by my planning staff. The height of the shelter does not significantly deviate from the approved scheme as you have suggested.”

Unbelievable I – Carlton Tavern

Not really – if a developer knows he will get away with it

A landlady returned to her pub after she was told to close for an CarltonTavern“inventory” to find builders had demolish the historic building. Developers ripped through Carlton Tavern the day before it was to become a listed building, according to councillors, after they had been denied planning permission. Read more:-
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/11525262/Bulldozers-level-historic-pub-the-day-before-it-is-due-to-be-listed.html