Monthly Archives: January 2018

Desperation

No-one in the Council will answer the question or will agree that the  enclosure or shed is nearly 3m taller than the approved plan – see more Evasions and Denials. The response below needs to go in at about 60. … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Call for Help – unanswered.

From: Michael Dawson Sent: 08 August 2017 14:01 To: Cllr John Anglin Cc: Rebecca Atkinson; Customer Advocates; Residents GP and HV Subject: Extension of UK Dock’s Slipway Cover, River Drive Dear Councillor Anglin. Please see letter attached. I have used … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

R4: You and Yours

23rd November 2017 Dear You and Yours, I listened with interest to your article about the Ombudsman on Monday 13th November and realised that while they have no real teeth because they cannot enforce their recommendations, their authority can be … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | Leave a comment

TGA and STC v the Residents

When we were trying and failing to get information about the planned height of UK Dock’s slipway cover out of the Council, a few of us suggested that we get the Tyne Gateway Assn (TGA) involved and an AGM was … Continue reading

Posted in Misconduct | Leave a comment

Emasculation of Complaints

This is zero on the list of methods or devices used by the Council to corrupt the complaints procedure. It is used to kill off any valid complaint at birth complaint that the Council do no wish to handle. Its … Continue reading

Posted in Misconduct, Procedure | Leave a comment

The Corporate Mislead

No 3 on the list of abuses of the Council’s use of the Complaints Procedure and is the way that they say that a complaint about a complaint has been handled is the same as the complaint itself. I wrote … Continue reading

Posted in Misconduct | Leave a comment

Amendments to Plans and Drawings

9th January 2018 –  Paragraph 2: last sentence deleted: /The only drawing from 1996 held by the Council and authorised by the T&WDC shows a planned height of 12.7m at the inland end./ new paragraph inserted in its place: /The only drawing from … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | Leave a comment

Interference by the Chair of the TGA.

There was no agenda because the Councillor said at the TGA meeting he would find out if the structure was built to approved plans i.e. it was the only item on the agenda, as simple as that. Some of us … Continue reading

Posted in Procedure | Leave a comment