Monthly Archives: March 2018

Questions Ignored

Examples of Observations and /or Complaints arising from the breaches in planning control of the conditions of the grant in 1996 that have not been directly addressed: Condition 2 25-Nov-13, Observation that the structure was too high and too wide … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Alternative Facts about the Height

A Time Line of Evasions or Denials. Case Officer, 9-Sep-13: Hello – I stamped these drawings on the day they were handed to me in reception, as I explained these are copies of drawings passed in 1996 by the T&W … Continue reading

Posted in Misinformation/Misrepresentation | Leave a comment


Detail notes on the drawing ” strips to draw back to each side to allow access for boats” show that it is the river end rather than the road end and the boats arrive on the slipway from the river. … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | Leave a comment


The height of the landward end is 12.7m (roof height: 108.8m – height at the foot: 96.1m)* and confirms that it is reasonable to say, “that 8296/1A, 8296/1B, 8296/2 and 8296/4 represent the development which was approved in 1996” only … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | 4 Comments

The Truth about the Height Using 1A.

Explanation of Drawing 8296/1A – (copy of document sent to the Ombudsman) Notes 1. There is a clearer picture shown in the accompanying file: drawing 82961A.pdf 2. Mr Atkinson, the planning Manager has said that when this drawing is viewed … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | 2 Comments