9th January 2018 – Paragraph 2:
- last sentence deleted: /The only drawing from 1996 held by the Council and authorised by the T&WDC shows a planned height of 12.7m at the inland end./
- new paragraph inserted in its place: /The only drawing from 1996 held by the Council with dimensions and authorised by the T&WDC shows a planned height of 12.7m at the inland end./
There is also an authorised drawing without any dimensions.
11th August 2017 –Longitudinal Section and 8296/1B
Second point:
- the river end is shown as the same height as the landward end at 15.5m which is an impossibility considering the gradient of 2.656m(2.7m).
replaced by:
- the river end is shown as the same height as the landward end at 15.5m, therefore the roof should slope down towards the river with the same gradient as the slipway (2.7m). The roof is level in the longitudinal section so one of the dimensions is wrong.