-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Trail of Deceit | Harbour View on Contact Restrictions Review
- STC and Corruption: Petitions | Harbour View on Approved Drawing 8296/14
- Hiding Duplicity | Harbour View on Vexatious Complaints
- The Buck/Palmer Con | Harbour View on Copy Solicitors’ Letter
- Hiding Duplicity | Harbour View on Approved Drawing 8296/14
- Home
- Posts
- Undercurrents
- STC/MP/LGO
- UK Dock's Shed
- Contact
Archives
- January 2024 (1)
- November 2023 (2)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (2)
- June 2023 (1)
- May 2023 (5)
- April 2023 (1)
- March 2023 (4)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (1)
- November 2022 (1)
- October 2022 (1)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (1)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (3)
- May 2022 (3)
- April 2022 (5)
- March 2022 (5)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (2)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (2)
- October 2021 (2)
- September 2021 (1)
- August 2021 (3)
- July 2021 (3)
- June 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (2)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (5)
- May 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (5)
- January 2020 (5)
- December 2019 (7)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (5)
- August 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (5)
- April 2019 (2)
- March 2019 (14)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (2)
- December 2018 (8)
- November 2018 (7)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (8)
- August 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (2)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (4)
- January 2018 (8)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (2)
- May 2017 (2)
- March 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (2)
- October 2016 (1)
- September 2016 (8)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (1)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (6)
- January 2016 (2)
- November 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (2)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (2)
- June 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (1)
- December 2014 (1)
- November 2014 (1)
- March 2014 (4)
- January 2014 (2)
- October 2013 (3)
- September 2013 (3)
- August 2013 (1)
Category Archives: Planning
Approved Drawing 8296/14
This was approved by the Planning Manager on 14th October 2013, ST114613COND Decision Notice.pdf, and the height and width can be gauged by scaling using the portal columns and roof beam. The gable end is drawn to a scale of … Continue reading
Posted in Planning
8 Comments
Response to Complaint re Cllr A: MP
Dear Emma, Cllr Anglin and the meeting at the Town Hall 25-Nov-13. I wrote to you on the 1-Oct thanking you for taking notice of my complaint. You will know by now the Council did eventually acknowledge my complaint and … Continue reading
Posted in Abuse of Complaints System, MP, Planning
Leave a comment
Observations and Complaint, 10-Jan-14
From: M Dawson To: planning.enquiries@southtyneside.gov.uk Subject: Slipway Development – River Drive. Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:55:35 Dear Sir. Please find attached copies of drawings nos. 8296/1A and 8296/1B, 8296/14 and a photograph of the road end elevation of the … Continue reading
denied – Request for approved documents
The Correspondence following a meeting, 25-Nov-2013, originally called because the Planning Officer had stopped communicating is laid out in a flat file below. The initial drawings sent to the complainants indicated that the shed was about 3m taller than planned. … Continue reading
Posted in Misconduct, Planning
Leave a comment
An Inescapable Truth
There are two drawings that show a height for the landward end of the shed of 15.5m and neither were approved because it was a mistake made by the draftman in 1996. Why the Council do not hold a corrected … Continue reading
Posted in LGO, Misinformation/Misrepresentation, Planning
1 Comment
8296/14
Detail notes on the drawing ” strips to draw back to each side to allow access for boats” show that it is the river end rather than the road end and the boats arrive on the slipway from the river. … Continue reading
Posted in Planning
Leave a comment
8296/2
The height of the landward end is 12.7m (roof height: 108.8m – height at the foot: 96.1m)* and confirms that it is reasonable to say, “that 8296/1A, 8296/1B, 8296/2 and 8296/4 represent the development which was approved in 1996” only … Continue reading
Posted in Planning
4 Comments
The Truth about the Height Using 1A.
Explanation of Drawing 8296/1A – (copy of document sent to the Ombudsman) Notes 1. There is a clearer picture shown in the accompanying file: drawing 82961A.pdf 2. Mr Atkinson, the planning Manager has said that when this drawing is viewed … Continue reading
Posted in Planning
2 Comments
Breaches in Planning – Ignored by STC
Covered Shipyard on River Drive. Letter to Paul 22-Feb-18. When a neighbour said last summer, “The thought of having to tell UK Docks to modify their new shed plus the repercussions it would have on the second proposed shed must … Continue reading
Posted in Misconduct, Planning
2 Comments
TGA and STC v the Residents.
The set of emails shows that the Chairman of the TGA and the Council were working in tandem to assist UK Docks in their development and to cover up the breaches in the height and width of the cover. Mar … Continue reading
Posted in Misconduct, Planning
Leave a comment