Category Archives: Planning

Approved Drawing 8296/14

This was approved by the Planning Manager on 14th October 2013, ST114613COND Decision Notice.pdf, and the height and width can be gauged by scaling using the portal columns and roof beam. The gable end is drawn to a scale of … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | 8 Comments

Response to Complaint re Cllr A: MP

Dear Emma, Cllr Anglin and the meeting at the Town Hall 25-Nov-13. I wrote to you on the 1-Oct thanking you for taking notice of my complaint. You will know by now the Council did eventually acknowledge my complaint and … Continue reading

Posted in Abuse of Complaints System, MP, Planning | Leave a comment

Observations and Complaint, 10-Jan-14

From: M Dawson To: planning.enquiries@southtyneside.gov.uk Subject: Slipway Development – River Drive. Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:55:35 Dear Sir. Please find attached copies of drawings nos. 8296/1A and 8296/1B, 8296/14 and a photograph of the road end elevation of the … Continue reading

Posted in Planning, UK Docks | 1 Comment

denied – Request for approved documents

The Correspondence following a meeting, 25-Nov-2013, originally called because the Planning Officer had stopped communicating is laid out in a flat file below. The initial drawings sent to the complainants indicated that the shed was about 3m taller than planned. … Continue reading

Posted in Misconduct, Planning | Leave a comment

An Inescapable Truth

There are two drawings that show a height for the landward end of the shed of 15.5m and neither were approved because it was a mistake made by the draftman in 1996. Why the Council do not hold a corrected … Continue reading

Posted in LGO, Misinformation/Misrepresentation, Planning | 1 Comment

8296/14

Detail notes on the drawing ” strips to draw back to each side to allow access for boats” show that it is the river end rather than the road end and the boats arrive on the slipway from the river. … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | Leave a comment

8296/2

The height of the landward end is 12.7m (roof height: 108.8m – height at the foot: 96.1m)* and confirms that it is reasonable to say, “that 8296/1A, 8296/1B, 8296/2 and 8296/4 represent the development which was approved in 1996” only … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | 4 Comments

The Truth about the Height Using 1A.

Explanation of Drawing 8296/1A – (copy of document sent to the Ombudsman) Notes 1. There is a clearer picture shown in the accompanying file: drawing 82961A.pdf 2. Mr Atkinson, the planning Manager has said that when this drawing is viewed … Continue reading

Posted in Planning | 2 Comments

Breaches in Planning – Ignored by STC

Covered Shipyard on River Drive. Letter to Paul 22-Feb-18. When a neighbour said last summer, “The thought of having to tell UK Docks to modify their new shed plus the repercussions it would have on the second proposed shed must … Continue reading

Posted in Misconduct, Planning | 2 Comments

TGA and STC v the Residents.

The set of emails shows that the Chairman of the TGA and the Council were working in tandem to assist UK Docks in their development and to cover up the breaches in the height and width of the cover. Mar … Continue reading

Posted in Misconduct, Planning | Leave a comment