Monthly Archives: February 2020

Evasion or Denial, Unanswered

To Monitoring Officer: 26-Feb-20

Leave a comment 
Earlier Email sent 07:35 in error. 
Message finishes after the first six words of the second paragraph.
If you look at the background . . . . !!  
Fwd: Correspondence with the Office of Emma Lewell-Buck
From: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Date: 26/02/2020 (11:00:43 BST)
To: Nicola Robason

Attachment: Dear Nicola 5-Dec-19.pdf (129 KB)

Dear Nicola,

I should have written and thanked you for confirming that UK Docks have never been granted permission for the shed we now see on River Drive. The question remains why did they tell Councillor Hamilton and the MP for South Shields some time in March or April 2019 that they had permission for it.

If you had looked at the background to this which I outlined to you in a letter on the 5th December (now reattached) you will see that that UK Docks were given permission to build an enclosure on their slipway with a height of 15m at the river end but they built one with a height of 18.2m and the argument about whether it has been approved or not has not been settled because the Council continue to imply, contrary to the evidence, that it is not 2.7m taller than permitted.

You say /“It remains the case that all complaints procedures relating to this matter have been exhausted both internally within the Council and externally.”/ but that is not true because the lie, misinformation and/or misrepresentation given by the Local Authority, told to the Ombudsman still remains uncorrected:

/The complainant says the shed is also 3 metres higher than it should be. The Council says it is not. There is no fault in how the Council decided the shed is the permitted height. /Ombudsman 15-Apr-15

Until it is corrected you are not entitled to say that all relating to this matter has been exhausted. I have tried to correct it but they just dismiss it because the say that my complaint remains the same.

Only someone with authority over the people that misled the Ombudsman are now able to correct it and if it is not you please tell me who would be in a position to do this if it is not the MP for South Shields

Yours sincerely,
Michael Dawson

Information Only

Coercive Control: 25-Feb-20

Leave a comment

Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
From: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Date: 25/02/2020 (15:36:22 BST)
To: Cllr Angela Hamilton
Cc: Simon Buck

3 Attachments:
Destroying Evidence.pdf (66 KB)
DishonestyatTH-Emma30Oct19.pdf (31 KB)
toSimonBuck24-Feb-20.pdf (33 KB)

Hi Angela,
The message below only goes to confirm my suspicions about Mr Palmer and it was received within a minute of the email sent to Simon and copied to you and others yesterday.
It appears Mr Palmer is not working in Emma’s interest but rather for the same party that tried to deselect Emma and excluded you from the Labour Group.
He appears to have been planted in Emma’s office to serve those who wish to the hide facts about the shed from general view so I’ve attached ‘Destroying Evidence’, ‘Dishonesty at the Town Hall’ and a copy of the email that Mr Parker has blanked and please forward them to Emma if she has not seen them.
I had made no secret of the fact that I had moved back to Amble in September 2017 and had maintained fairly amiable with Emma’s office until October last year. That was when I first began to receive auto responses from Emma’s office and I thought that had been sorted when I copied her an email addressed to Nicola Robason on the 31st January. It obviously had not and In what looks like an act of coercive control Mr Parker has put me on a black list and I wonder if Emma, Paul and Julie know they have been added by him as well.
The fact that he put me on a blacklist rather confirms my point about his and Hayley’s paymaster.
Cheers
Michael

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System -----
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:50:04 +0000
From: Mail Delivery System <mailer-daemon@oberon.servers.prgn.misp.co.uk>
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
To:mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk</mailer-daemon@oberon.servers.prgn.misp.co.uk>

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk
host eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com [195.130.217.241]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk>:
550 sip.invaluement.mimecast.org Blocked by ivmSIP and/or ivmSIP/24
- seehttps://www.invaluement.com/lookup/?item=87.247.244.117.
-https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#550[yYZQXAUCMB-h7D8oWCeelQ.uk30]</emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk>

palmerk@parliament.uk
host eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com [195.130.217.241]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<palmerk@parliament.uk>:
550 sip.invaluement.mimecast.org Blocked by ivmSIP and/or ivmSIP/24 
- seehttps://www.invaluement.com/lookup/?item=87.247.244.117.
-https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#550[0l0DEVnnNiOc6-0OMxdFow.uk30]</palmerk@parliament.uk>

davidroutledge@btinternet.com and hepburnsenp@btinternet.com
host mx.lb.btinternet.com [213.120.69.2]
SMTP error from remote mail server after pipelined MAIL FROM:<mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk> SIZE=1743171:
522-email sent from 87.247.244.117 found on industry IP blacklists (Spamhaus/Invaluement/ReturnPath) on 2020/02/24 16:49:53 GMT.
522 To protect our customers, we use leading industry providers of blacklists to ensure only good senders can send email to us. 
</mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk>

One would have to ask Mr Palmer why Julia and Paul had been black listed. This was the only list on which they appeared. They and Mr Palmer disappeared from the next list that appeared, 26-Mar-16, and with the last use of Mimecast.com, 18-May-20, we were just left with Emma and Simon Buck.

Evasion or Denial

To Mr Buck: 24-Feb-2020

Leave a comment 
Duplicated from the The Harbour View Blog because it 
links the Monitoring Officer for the Council and
 Mr Palmer <palmerk@parliament.uk>.
Neither addressed the questions raised;
http://theharbourview.co.uk/blog/from-nicola-robason-26-feb-20/
effectively denies any inappropriate conduct by Council; 
http://theharbourview.co.uk/blog/threat-from-simon-buck-26-feb-20/
wrongly applies a Parliamentary Code of Conduct to me.

Fwd: Conduct of South Tyneside Council
From: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Date: 24/02/2020 (16:49:52 PM GMT)
To: Simon Buck
Cc: Keith Palmer, Emma Lewell-Buck MP, Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis, Nicola Robason, Stuart Wright, George Mansbridge, Hayley Johnson
Bcc: 20 or so local residents

Mail Delivery Notice of failure:-
The rejection from ELB’s inbox was expected but not that of Mr Palmer, Julie and Paul, two of the local residents, are probably on the list because they ask pertinent questions like, “Is it true what Mr Dawson is saying?” The answer is a simple yes.

Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
From: Mail Delivery System
Date: 24/02/2020 (16:50:04 BST)
To: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk
    host eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com [195.130.217.241]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk>:
    550 sip.invaluement.mimecast.org Blocked by ivmSIP and/or ivmSIP/24 - see https://www.invaluement.com/lookup/?item=87.247.244.117. - https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#550 [yYZQXAUCMB-h7D8oWCeelQ.uk30]

  palmerk@parliament.uk
    host eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com [195.130.217.241]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<palmerk@parliament.uk>:
    550 sip.invaluement.mimecast.org Blocked by ivmSIP and/or ivmSIP/24 - see https://www.invaluement.com/lookup/?item=87.247.244.117. - https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#550 [0l0DEVnnNiOc6-0OMxdFow.uk30]
	
  davidroutledge@btinternet.com
    host mx.lb.btinternet.com [213.120.69.2]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after pipelined MAIL FROM:<mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk> SIZE=1743171:
    522-email sent from 87.247.244.117 found on industry IP blacklists (Spamhaus/Invaluement/ReturnPath) on 2020/02/24 16:49:53 GMT.
    522 To protect our customers, we use leading industry providers of blacklists to ensure only good senders can send email to us. If believe this is a mistake, please contact them directly as there is nothing our Postmaster will be able to do.

  hepburnsenp@btinternet.com
    host mx.lb.btinternet.com [213.120.69.2]
    SMTP error from remote mail server after pipelined MAIL FROM:<mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk> SIZE=1743171:
    522-email sent from 87.247.244.117 found on industry IP blacklists (Spamhaus/Invaluement/ReturnPath) on 2020/02/24 16:49:53 GMT.
    522 To protect our customers, we use leading industry providers of blacklists to ensure only good senders can send email to us. If believe this is a mistake, please contact them directly as there is nothing our Postmaster will be able to do.

Note: 
550 errors: this error is often a problem at the recipient’s end, meaning it is probably not caused by ones own email hosting server. 
522 errors:  error is typically encountered when there is a problem related to an attachment in your email. ... Some mail servers also seem to use this error code incorrectly when blocking a message due to triggering a filter such as a URL in the message being found in a domain black list. 
</mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk></mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk></palmerk@parliament.uk></emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk>

4 Attachments – now referenced directly from this post:
Frames11sep13.jpg
Detail_river_end_1B.jpg
D8296_14.pdf
D8296_2.pdf

Continue reading To Mr Buck: 24-Feb-2020 →

Unanswered

Dear Mr Palmer: 20-Feb-20

Leave a comment

is rejected from two accounts within seconds:-

Automatic reply: Conduct of South Tyneside Council
From: LEWELL-BUCK, Emma
Date: 20/02/2020 (12:06:28 BST)
To: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Please note that if you do not provide your full address no further action will be taken on your case.
~~~
Automatic reply: Conduct of South Tyneside Council
From: PALMER, Keith
Date: 20/02/2020 (12:06:30 BST)
To: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
I am out of the office until Monday 24th February 2020.

It still remains unanswered:-

Conduct of South Tyneside Council
From: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.ukDate: 20/02/2020 (12:06:14 GMT)
To: Keith Palmer
Cc: Emma Lewell-Buck MP,
Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis, Cllr Anglin,
Graeme Watson [Chair of TGA],
Peter Cunningham [Principal Planning Officer],
Nicola Robason [Monitoring Officer],
Stuart Wright [Head of Environment],
Bcc: Local Residents
2 Attachments:
Dishonesty at the Town Hall: 30-Oct-19
~~~
Destroying Evidence: 20-Feb-20

Dear Mr Palmer,
You appear to be new to your post and so I given you some background to the Council’s early responses to our complaint that the shed was taller and wider than permitted. Please see ‘Destroying Evidence’ which I have attached. It should more properly be labelled ‘Hiding Evidence’ or ‘Sweeping stuff under the Carpet’ but we cannot know that our emails have not been deleted nor our letters put in the bin.
Please see also below the email sent to your office two and a half years ago and the response I had from Emma about 4 hours later giving an account of her discussions with the Council and a meeting with the directors of UK Docks in the spring of 2017. Central to that account are:
/Unfortunately, the Ombudsman’s decision cannot be re-visited. & I have met with the directors of UK Docks and have also liaised with the council and I am certain that no laws have been broken and the council are also discharging their functions correctly in relation to the boat yard and the subsequent containers which have caused concern to residents./

From the first it appears that the Council can give misinformation/misrepresentation (lie) to Ombudsman and there is nothing we can do about it and I would just like to add that when she met with the Directors in the Spring, the containers were not an issue as they were not hoisted on top of each other till August when UK Docks needed the space to assemble the sixth frame. I you look at any of the plans submitted in 1996 there are only 5 and this brings me to the main point of this email.
That she has must have been told that no laws have been broken and that might be true but to say that to mean that the shed is built to the approved plans is fraudulent misrepresentation.

Continue reading Dear Mr Palmer: 20-Feb-20 →