Fwd: Correspondence with the Office of Emma Lewell-Buck MP
From: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Date: 26/03/2020 (16:10:58 BST)
To: Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis

Attachment: blacklisted24-Feb-20.pdf (20 KB)

Dear Councillors,

I’ll try and keep this short. My correspondence with Emma is being bounced by some blacklisting software introduced by Keith Palmer who appears to be one of her office staff:

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk host eu-smtp-inbound
-1.mimecast.com [91.220.42.196]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO:<emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk>:
550 Undeliverable mail [VGi21rveP62eZ3cTRxIObw.uk127]

I know it is he and not Simon Buck because Mr Palmer installed the software from mimecast.com on the server in Emma’s office some time between 20th and the 24th February – see attached.
It only goes to prove the case against him made this lunchtime, see email to Emma below, is well founded and if one of you can forward your copy with its attachment/ MPemailsDec19Jan20.pdf/ to emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk it would be much appreciated.

Kind regards,
Mick Dawson

The last paragraph says quite a lot and I knew what I meant when I wrote it. For clarity it has been rewritten for those who wish to get acquainted with the facts:-

I know it is he and not Simon Buck because Mr Palmer installed the software from mimecast.com on the server in Emma’s office some time between 20th and the 24th February – see attached:-
blacklisted24-Feb-20.pdf

It only goes to prove the case against him made this lunchtime, see email to Emma below:-
toELB26-Mar-20.pdf

is well founded and if one of you can forward your copy with its attachment:-MPemailsDec19Jan20.pdf *

to emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk it would be much appreciated.

* just skip to pages 5 and 6 which concern my last email to Emma before the Christmas break and the first Email to her after the phone call.

Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
From: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Date: 25/02/2020 (15:36:22 BST)
To: Cllr Angela Hamilton
Cc: Simon Buck

3 Attachments:
Destroying Evidence.pdf (66 KB)
DishonestyatTH-Emma30Oct19.pdf (31 KB)
toSimonBuck24-Feb-20.pdf (33 KB)

Hi Angela,
The message below only goes to confirm my suspicions about Mr Palmer and it was received within a minute of the email sent to Simon and copied to you and others yesterday.
It appears Mr Palmer is not working in Emma’s interest but rather for the same party that tried to deselect Emma and excluded you from the Labour Group.
He appears to have been planted in Emma’s office to serve those who wish to the hide facts about the shed from general view so I’ve attached ‘Destroying Evidence’, ‘Dishonesty at the Town Hall’ and a copy of the email that Mr Parker has blanked and please forward them to Emma if she has not seen them.
I had made no secret of the fact that I had moved back to Amble in September 2017 and had maintained fairly amiable with Emma’s office until October last year. That was when I first began to receive auto responses from Emma’s office and I thought that had been sorted when I copied her an email addressed to Nicola Robason on the 31st January. It obviously had not and In what looks like an act of coercive control Mr Parker has put me on a black list and I wonder if Emma, Paul and Julie know they have been added by him as well.
The fact that he put me on a blacklist rather confirms my point about his and Hayley’s paymaster.
Cheers
Michael

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System -----
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 16:50:04 +0000
From: Mail Delivery System <mailer-daemon@oberon.servers.prgn.misp.co.uk>
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
To:mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk</mailer-daemon@oberon.servers.prgn.misp.co.uk>

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk
host eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com [195.130.217.241]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk>:
550 sip.invaluement.mimecast.org Blocked by ivmSIP and/or ivmSIP/24
- seehttps://www.invaluement.com/lookup/?item=87.247.244.117.
-https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#550[yYZQXAUCMB-h7D8oWCeelQ.uk30]</emma.lewell-buck.mp@parliament.uk>

palmerk@parliament.uk
host eu-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com [195.130.217.241]
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<palmerk@parliament.uk>:
550 sip.invaluement.mimecast.org Blocked by ivmSIP and/or ivmSIP/24 
- seehttps://www.invaluement.com/lookup/?item=87.247.244.117.
-https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#550[0l0DEVnnNiOc6-0OMxdFow.uk30]</palmerk@parliament.uk>

davidroutledge@btinternet.com and hepburnsenp@btinternet.com
host mx.lb.btinternet.com [213.120.69.2]
SMTP error from remote mail server after pipelined MAIL FROM:<mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk> SIZE=1743171:
522-email sent from 87.247.244.117 found on industry IP blacklists (Spamhaus/Invaluement/ReturnPath) on 2020/02/24 16:49:53 GMT.
522 To protect our customers, we use leading industry providers of blacklists to ensure only good senders can send email to us. 
</mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk>

One would have to ask Mr Palmer why Julia and Paul had been black listed. This was the only list on which they appeared. They and Mr Palmer disappeared from the next list that appeared, 26-Mar-16, and with the last use of Mimecast.com, 18-May-20, we were just left with Emma and Simon Buck.

Fwd: Correspondence with the Office of Emma Lewell-Buck
From: mick.dawson@theharbourview.co.uk
Date: 16/01/2020 (09:53:32 BST)

To: BUCK, Simon, Keith Palmer

Cc: Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis, Cllr Anglin, Nicola Robason, Hayley Johnson, Alison Hoy

1 Attachment: ToAH27Mar19part1.pdf (162 KB)

Dear Sirs,

I can confirm that UK Docks did not submit an application for the Council for retrospective planning and the email I sent to Councillor Hamilton I have copied to a PDF file and attached it. She may be able to help you with the legal points you wish to raise.

I have a dispute with Mrs Johnson about the misinformation/misrepresentation given to the Local Government Ombudsman. I agree with Mr Tilbury of Peter Dunn & co but she maintains that there is no evidence of any. I sent you both a copy of his advice yesterday because Mr Palmer alluded to vexatious communications.

He also suggested I sought legal advice but I had already done so. It looks to me like it was probably criminal fraud for UK Docks to convince the Council that they were building their shed to a set of approved plans when they were not and I was advised that the Police would take no action because they would say it was a Planning Matter.

UK Docks have not done themselves any favours by telling people that they have permission for their shed when they haven’t.. It looks to me like they have been breaking the law since March 2014 when they took the Port of Tyne Tug onto the slipway and the Council have been complicit in this.

It was Director of UK Docks who decided to move his business the River Drive and he only had permission for a shed 22m long and it is now 27.5m long which is probably the main reason we were told he had been given permission for it by the Council.

I’ll leave it with you for the time being.

M Dawson