Category Archives: Misrepresentation

Evasions and Denials or Lies

A Criticism of Corporate Lead

Critique – November 2020

Mr Dawson
Date: 1 August 2016                      Our Ref: CX/253539
Greens Place                             Your Ref: 2248789
South Shields
Tyne and Wear NE33 2AQ

Dear Mr Dawson

Thank you for your letter to Martin Swales, Chief Executive dated 8 July 2016, requesting matters related to your previous complaint to be raised as a new complaint, I manage the process and staff that support customer complaints and compliments. Your letter has therefore been forwarded to me to consider and respond.

Mrs Johnson has changed the reference 248789 to 253539. The latter was raised by the Head of Development Services to overwrite the original complaint of 10-Jan-14 again. I say again because the Planning Manager had already overwritten the original, after the Principal Planning Officer, Mr Cunningham, referred me back to the Tyne Gateway Assn instead of passing it and the responsibility for it to the Enforcement Section.

Having considered the contents of your letter and the final decision by the Local Government Ombudsman, I am now in a position to respond.

My letter was about the Council giving misinformation/misrepresentation to the Ombudsman and to reinforce that point I said: “I ask you to look again at this because there is a clear contradiction between what the Council were telling the LGO and what is known. Why your staff should misrepresent the facts to the LGO is for you to determine. That they have misinformed the LGO should be admitted and corrected and that is what this letter is about.”

There is no evidence to suggest that there has been deliberate misinformation provided by Council officers to the Local Government Ombudsman,
Continue reading A Criticism of Corporate Lead

UK Docks

Subject:UK Docks
From:"Cllr Angela Hamilton" <cllr.angela.hamilton@southtyneside.gov.uk>
Date: Wed, March 6, 2019 11:46 am
To: David and Julie, Melanie and I.
Cc: David Francis and, Emma Lewell-Buck MP.

This email has been classified as: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED

Hello All

As you are aware myself and Emma Lewell-Buck MP met with UK Docks on Friday lastweek when I raised a number of concerns on behalf of residents. I apologise forthe slight delay in responding but I needed to clarify a couple of points with officers first to make sure I answered as many of your concerns as possible.

Background
UK Docks are the owners of a boat yard on River Drive which is the companiesHeadquarters. The main services provided from the River Drive location includerepairs for boats and small ships, a marine supply store, workshop facilities and base for staff who repair and maintain ships in various locations around theworld. There are no repairs to large ships or shipbuilding on the site as the dock is not large enough for this. The business provides jobs in the local area and offers traineeships and apprenticeships.

Issues raised
Since UK Docks opened the site on River Drive a number of concerns have been raised by residents about the operation of the premises. My response to each of these issues are below:

Containers: As I believe you are already aware the containers have now been moved. Some of the containers will be removed from the site while others have been moved to another location on the site which does not overlook any houses. There was a delay in these being moved due to delays in building works being completed (see below) but hopefully this issue is now resolved.

Jetties: Although there were proposals for jetties included in the plans there has never been any confirmation of if and when these would be built. At the moment there are no plans to build the jetties. I have asked UK Docks to let meknow if this position changes.

Lighting: UK Docks confirmed that there were some problems with lighting when the office building first opened. This was due to a fault with the automatic lights which were not turning off when the building was empty. As I am sure youcan imagine this was a concern for the company as well as local residents. The fault has been fixed and I have been reassured that the only lights that are on overnight are security lights that are required on sites such as this. Given that there is street lighting in the areas these lights are unlikely to have anyadverse impact on the area.

Building works: The work to build the office building was delayed as the builders contracted to do this went out of business meaning UK Docks had to complete the work themselves using local contractors. The main building work isnow complete so hopefully there will be no further issues relating to this.

Car park: UK Docks have told me that they will be carrying out the works on thecar park over the next few weeks. While this may mean there will be some increase in noise for a short period of time I have been assured that this will not be carried out early in the morning, late in the evening or on Sundays. There may be a need to carry out some work on Saturday mornings but this will be kept to a minimum. Once the car park has been completed this will create a gap between houses and the area where work is carried out which should assist in reducing noise levels.

Noise reduction: The noise reduction boards that are currently in place are not MDF but a heavy duty material used in the marine industry and are seen as the most effective in reducing noise. UK Docks are not opposed to planting trees along the border and will consider this but there are a number of issues that need to be considered before this is agreed including: type of trees; impact ofplanting trees on surround properties as it is important that anything planted does not cause problems for the foundations; and whether planting trees would help reduce noise levels. This is something we can discuss with UK Docks once the car park is finished.

Privacy: Having visited the site and attended a meeting in the office building Idon’t believe there are any issues. There is one window that faces the rear of the houses on Harbour View but it is virtually impossible to see into either the houses or the gardens from this window due to the angle of the building and the window. If you are still concerned please let me know and I will contact UK Docks to see if there is anything that can be done to provide you with additional reassurance.

Planning: While I understand the concerns you have raised about the buildings deviating from the original plans I cannot see any way to resolve this issue. You have said that the building is slightly wider and higher than the original plans but I have not been able to find out anything about why this happened. As I wasn’t a Councillor at the time I was not involved in any of the discussions so can’t confirm whether this was agreed before or after building works were completed and it wouldn’t be possible to reduce the building and it isn’t financially viable to remove and rebuild it. I believe that many of the issues may have been caused by a lack of communication between UK Docks, the Council and residents which is something I hope will not be an issue going forward.

UK Docks are happy to talk about any concerns going forward and, if you would like me to, I can facilitate discussions as and when required. I realise this may not be resolve all of your past concerns but hopefully it will allow us to build a relationship to prevent similar problems arising in the future.If you have any questions or need any more information please don’t hesitate to get in touch.RegardsCouncillor Angela HamiltonBeacon and Bents WardSouth Tyneside CouncilEmail: Cllr.angela.hamilton@southtyneside.gov.uk

Shed Load of Grief

shedloadofgrief

Dear Gazette,

I wrote to some neighbours about this on May 28th and copied it you because I mentioned a misleading article, in the Gazette attributed to Paul Kelly, on April 1st 2014. I understand he has moved on. I presumed because the Council were feeding him misleading information on the question of the height of the shed, that they had reverted to their position held in January of that year.

There was never any response to this email.

Pledge over shed blocking the view

Gazette: Tuesday 10 September 2013

SOUTH Tyneside Council has pledged to keep tabs on building work at a huge industrial shed which is blocking riverside views.
The 36ft-high structure is just yards from homes in Harbour View, South Shields.
The first residents knew of the development was when it emerged almost overnight at the Tyne Slipway.
How we broke this story
Continue reading Pledge over shed blocking the view

Anger as development begins 17 years on

Gazette: Monday 09 September 2013

RIVERSIDE residents in South Tyneside are up in arms after work began on a huge industrial shed – 17 years after planning permission was granted.
The 36ft-high structure is being built just yards from their homes in Harbour View, South Shields, and householders were stunned when the steel structure emerged almost overnight at the Tyne Slipway.
Continue reading Anger as development begins 17 years on