Concession

Admission II – 24th November 2014  by Customer Advocacy.
Not all is as it first appears in this email. The misinformation from Admission I stays buried and is joined by another from the Head of Development Services’ letter to residents. The  fundamental omission is covered glossed over.

Dear Mr Dawson

Thank you for your email dated 21 November 2014 which was forwarded to me for consideration.

I can confirm that as previously advised, the Council accepts that the structure in question does not have planning permission. My Stage 3 response to you dated 25 September 2014 also explained the reasons for the Council’s Head of Development Services’ decision that it was not expedient to take planning enforcement action with respect to the development. I am sorry that I am unable to make these points any more clearly than I already have.

Her Stage 3 response makes no mention of the height of the enclosure.

I note your intention to approach the Local Government Ombudsman and this is the correct route for you to now follow if you remain dissatisfied with the Council’s handling of this matter.

Yours sincerely
Performance and Information Officer
Strategy and Performance