[0] My understanding is that the responses that I had provided to you at this meeting enabled the matter to be closed.
I recall the meeting very well, it is one of the reasons this website exits. He said the cover was built to approved plans and is the first item in denials.
I did speak to the Chair of the TGA at their next committee meeting and he did not believe me and he declined my offer to show him how I had ascertained the width without access to the site. However it was agreed at the meeting that he would check width with the Council and report back – there is no evidence that this was ever done.
I was not happy with Mr Cunningham’s response especially his reference to the complaints procedure. This means he avoids having to explain why the Council had allowed work to continue on the shelter despite it not being built to approved plans. See evasions where he deflects a direct question about the height.
