Height and Response:1 9-Sep-2013

From: Principal Planning Officer
To: Greens Place Resident
CC: 6 Other Concerned Residents; Cllr John Anglin; Allr Audrey Mcmillan; Cllr.John.Wood
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:00:04 +0100
Subject: RE: Approved boat repair shelter at Tyne Slipway, River Drive, South Shields [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED] [PROTECT]

This email has been classified as: PROTECT

Hello – I stamped these drawings on the day they were handed to me in reception, as I explained these are copies of drawings passed in 1996 by the T&W Development Corporation the only difference is that these drawings do not have the approved stamps on them.
I attach a link to the Council’s website explaining the complaints procedure.

Complaints Procedure

Regards

Principal Planning Officer


From: Greens Place Resident
Sent: 09 September 2013 15:21
To: Principal Planning Officer
Cc: 6 Other Concerned Residents; Cllr John Anglin; Allr Audrey Mcmillan; Cllr.John.Wood
Subject: Re: Approved boat repair shelter at Tyne Slipway, River Drive, South Shields [NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED]

Dear  .  .  .  .  .  ,

From the stamp date on the revised plans, you have received plans on the 06.09.13 the day after construction commenced which show a increased height to the structure to that which was originally approved in 1996. Has the revised height of 15.5metres been approved or is it in breach of the 1996 Planning approval?

Please can you send me full details of the relevant complaints procedure.

Regards,
Greens Place Resident

One thought on “Height and Response:1 9-Sep-2013”

  1. This has been highlighted because the height was being questioned a few days after the frames went up.
    1) the structure does not look at all like the ‘1996’ plans.
    2) one of drawings made available is dated 1997.
    3) the height of the frames appears a lot higher than the 12m indicated on the drawing with the Grant of Planning Permission 1996.
    4) no attempt has been made to answer the basic question: Has the revised height of 15.5 metres been approved or is it in breach of the 1996 Planning approval?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.