09th December 2015 – Customer Advocacy use unsound LGO  decision to silence debate on the height question;
07th Dec 2015 – the Case Officer did not respond to a query about the planned height of the existing shed [laid off to Customer Advocates]

04th Dec 2015 – the Case Officer did not respond to a query about the planned height of the existing shed [laid off to Customer Advocates];
30th Sept 2015 – the Case Officer did not respond to a query about the planned height of the existing shed [laid off to Customer Advocates];
24 September  2014 – Stage 3 complaint – Customer Advocates repeat Stage 2 misinterpretation of drawing;
8th July 2014 – Head of Development Services did not bring drawing 8296/14 to meeting arranged to discuss it;
2nd June 2014 – Stage 2 complaint – Head of Development Services jumps to stage 2,  misrepresents drawing, change of complaint reference and avoids answering emails 4-Apr, 2-May & 9th May;
2nd June 2014 – Letter to Residents – Head of Development Services uses unsound drawing to claim there are no material differences apart from the width;
9th May 2014 – Head of Development Services ignores complaint that staff are not responding to questions about the height of the shed;
2nd May 2014 – Email to Head of Development Services about abuse of complaints system ignored.
2nd May 2014 – Head of Development Services in response to Petition uses unsound drawing to contradict admission of the Planning Manager on 13th Feb;1
4th April 2014 – Head of Development Services acknowledges receipt but does not answer or deny comments about the misinformation being fed to the local press;
1st April 2014 – Shields Gazette repeats misinformation of 9th and 10th Sept;
28th Jan 2014 – Planning Manager make an erroneous statement about which end of the shed is 15m high and refers me to the corporate complaints procedure if I’m not happy;
15th Jan 2014 – Planning Manager says dimensions are compliant when they are not;
13th Jan 2014 – Principal Planning Officer repeats Council message of 25th Nov 2013, the shed is legal when we know it is a meter wider than planned;
20th Dec 2013 – Principal Planning Officer says base and height of the structure are compliant;
25th Nov 2013 – Local Residents are told that the structure is ‘legal’ at a meeting with the Principal Planning Manager;
10th Sept 2013 – Shields Gazette repeats that the shed is 36ft (11m) high and work started in 2001;
9th Sept 2013 – Shields Gazette reports that the shed is 36ft (11m) high.
9th Sept 2013 – Case Officer refers Local Resident to the Complaints Procedure when asked about the height to quote “Has the revised height of 15.5metres been approved or is it in breach of the 1996 Planning approval?