Y2022
| 2022 | Simple method of showing the true planned height of the shed. |
| 14-Oct | Covering Email to Prologue to S and C and |
| 22-Sep | ? |
| 4-Aug | Covering Email to S and C 18 and UKD-Slipway-Enclosure.pdf (Shed and Corruption – Part 18) |
| 20-Jul | Covering Email to ELB and Attachment:- to EmmaLB20-Jul-22.pdf (111 KB) |
| 29-Apr | Repeat of Contact Restrictions Letter |
| date |
Y2021
| date | |
| September | Mr Tew’s appointment to CEO |
| 16-Jul | Shed and Corruption – Part 7 |
| 06-May | Response-Complaints Policy 2019v1.5 6-May-21.pdf |
| 30-Apr | Email to Customer Advocates copied to J Jumney |
| 29-Apr | Contact Restrictions Letter |
| 15-Apr | Nil Response from Interim Head of Legal Services – J Rumney |
| 14-Apr | Email to Interim Head of Legal Services – J Rumney |
| 12-Apr | Shed and Corruption – Part 2 |
| 12-Mar | Shed and Corruption – Part 1 |
| 11-Jan | S Buck – UK Docks and a Lost Year – 2020 Cpy ELB AMT Cllrs H and F AH |
| 5-Jan | to ELB STC and the Local Government Ombudsman Cpy NR JR and AH for forwarding to New CEO |
| 4-Jan | S Buck Testing his Mail box – This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently: * simon.buck@parliament.uk |
| 2021 | LGO Assessment Code.pdf |
Y2020
| Email L_Date | Description/Dialogues Document and URLs |
| 25-Dec | This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently: * john.rumney@southtynside.gov.uk Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with [Subject: “Re: Conflation of Complaints.”] to john.rumney@southtynside.gov.uk. |
| 24-Dec | Dear Leah, Thank you for responding on Nicola’s behalf. On reading back through the email this morning I realised that I should have asked Nicola to pass a copy of it to John Rumney as there are some serious legal points to be gone over before Nicola even considers her response. A blocking application appears to monitoring his incoming mails. Please excuse me for attaching it again and copying it Mr Rumney. It will check to see if the application is stiil live. Kind regards Michael Dawson |
| 23-Dec | Dear Nicola,My email started to grow like Topsy when I started to look back at the number of times that my questions/complaints about the height of the shed were referred to Customer Advocacy and especially how many times the responses were accompanied by misrepresentations of various kinds. Conflation-23-Dec-20.pdf |
| 18-Dec | Dear Nicola, I had become Resident’s spokesperson after the Town Hall meeting in November 2014 as I was the only person attending who spoke out against the proposition made by the Principal Planning Officer that the enclosure (shed) had been approved. BCandSTCtoJR7-Dec-20.pdf |
| 7-Dec | To J Rumney “At the end of the day, if all the evidence i.e. approved drawings, say that a structure is nearly 3 meters taller than planned then no amount of mudslinging can make it approved or permitted. CritiqueHJforCEO1Aug16 Building Control and South Tyneside Council. |
| 30-Nov | Dear All – No Secret :- I’ve made no secret of the fact that I believe that South Shields Council have been corrupting their complaints procedure and in turn that of the Local Government Ombudsman (Ombudsman) to hide the lack of building control amongst other things. It points to the reticence of their Chief Enforcement Officer to take any action against preferred developers who build what they want rather than what had been allowed. |
| 23-Oct | to ELB cc Cllr Angela H -who was KP |
| September | Mr Swales Resignation |
| 27-Jul | Response from Nicola Robason the Monitoring Officer |
| 22-Jul | to NR etcComplaint: 248789 – Unplanned Development on River Drive |
| 16-Jul | to Cllr DF cc Cllr AH, Cllr JA, ELB MP SB me – Complaint 248789 |
| 25-Jun | to CH cc ELB MP |
| 18-May | to KP etc. – Corres with ELB Office |
| 2-May | To ELB, ccp; Cllr H, Cllr F – LGO and Complaints Procedure |
| 26-Feb | Published: 1) Evidence that the Office Manager for the MP for South Shields had been set up by a ‘colleague’; 2) Threat from Simon Buck: Meanwhile established that Mr Palmer installed mimecast and not Simon Buck. Meanwhile the corruption and bullying at the Town Hall continue unabated. |
| 26-Feb | A busy day which starts with a message sent in error. |
| 25-Feb | Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender Coercive Control and introduction of Mimecast Anti Hacking Software to block incoming mail to MP. |
| 24-Feb | To: Simon Buck, Cc: Keith Palmer, Emma Lewell-Buck MP, Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis, Nicola Robason, Stuart Wright, George Mansbridge, Hayley Johnson Explanation of switch from 248789 to 253539 ignored. |
| 20-Feb | Why does Mr Palmer get Mr Buck to do his dirty work? To Keith Palmer, CC: Emma Lewell-Buck MP, Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis, Cllr Anglin, Graeme Watson, Peter Cunningham, Nicola Robason, Stuart Wright. Attachments: Dishonesty at the Town Hall or in layman’s terms UK Docks and the Council, have replaced one lie with another (that it was approved – to- approval given retrospectively). and Destroying Evidence which linked the goings on at the Town Hall to Grenfell Fire Disaster. The switches to stop emails from reaching his boss that were removed by Mr Buck on 24-Jan have been put back in place. Mr Palmer is back in control. |
| 02-Feb | Retrieve drawings and other documents from Sunderland and call in at the Chronicle Offices in Newcastle on the way home. Some interest but it seemed to have died in the weeks following. |
| The Email to Monitoring Officer on the 31st was a tidy up exercise to make sure everyone was aware that the shed was nearly 3m too tall and I decided to reclaim my copies of 8296/1A and 8296/2 from Peter Dunn and Co. with a view to giving a public lecture on the corruption endemic in South Tyneside Council | |
| 31-Jan | To Monitoring Officer, Cc: Emma Lewell-Buck MP, Keith Palmer, Buck Simon, Customer Advocates, Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis, Cllr Anglin, Peter Cunningham. Attachment: D8296/2 – the only authorised drawing from 1966 with dimensions and it shows the authorised height of the shed is 12.7m. It is 15.5m at that point and therefore 2.8m taller than allowed under Condition 2. |
| 24-Jan | Thank you email to Mr Buck, CC: K Palmer, Cllr Hamilton where I add a little more background in Corporate Lead and Members of Parliament dealing with Sunday working (Condition 5) etc. |
| 23-Jan | To Mr Palmer, CC: Emma Lewell-Buck MP, Buck Simon, Cllr Angela Hamilton, Cllr David Francis, Cllr Anglin, Peter Cunningham, Hayley Johnson. No rejections but no responses either. Experimented with a new method of giving evidence which I believe was not well received. References are now contained within the main email. The point: if you had paid attention to the facts rather than opinions based on fraudulent misrepresentations you would have come to the conclusion that UK Dock’s shed is 3 meters taller than planned, still stands. |
| 17-Jan | To Melanie, CC: Mr Buck, Mr Palmer, Monitoring Officer; Querying the Attachments: Dishonesty at the Town Hall and Cllr Anglin’s Misconduct. The first centres around the fact that UK Docks and the Council, have replaced one lie with another, i.e: that the shed was approved, TO: they had been given approval retrospectively and the second centres around ” Drawing 8296/2 as explained above gives an approved height of 12.7m.” |
| 16-Jan | Email to Messrs Buck and Palmer. Who take no notice of the attachment: Councillor Anglin’s Misconduct. I also have a dispute with Mrs Johnson about the misinformation/misrepresentation given to the Local Government Ombudsman. I agree with Mr Tilbury of Peter Dunn & co, see 8DLL.pdf sent on 13th January but she maintains that there is no evidence of any. |
| 15-Jan | Email to Mr Buck is ignored. He has no wish to answer the Question: By the way Nicola Robason has confirmed that UK Docks did not put in a retrospective planning request which beggars the question: Why did they tell Angela and Emma that they had. Perhaps Mr Palmer can answer the question? They also ignore all the evidence given to the solicitor in early 2016 and all the relevant notices posted since 2013 |
| 14-Jan | Response from Simon Buck. He obviously had not been shown ZA4803, the email to the MP by Mr Palmer. I did not send Mr Buck a copy of either email and the emails to the MP had been rejected. Cllr Hamilton added to CCs 18-Jan-20. |
| 14-Jan | AM; 2nd Email to MP Emma Lewell-Buck, CC: K Palmer, N Robason and the Head of Legal Services – Mike Harding. 2nd Auto response from her Office – Indicating I’m not interested switch is set. Notice from postmaster – Mike Harding appears to have left. |
| 13-Jan | PM: 1st Email to MP Emma Lewell-Buck, CC: K Palmer and Cllrs. Auto response from her Office: Please note that if you do not provide your full address no further action will be taken on your case – Not Interested Indicator. |
| 13-Jan | AM: Mr Palmer leaves a message to call him about UK Docks. PM: Return Call to Mr Palmer on 0191 427 1240 (MP’s Office) and discover that I had been set up. At first he let me assume he was Emma’s new Office Manager when said he was just going to file my emails away without acknowledgement I was reminded of the action against me taken by the Town Hall and realised he had conned his way into the MP’s Office. He was not interested in corruption at the Town and tells me that any further correspondence to the MP will be placed on file without a response under the label of vexatious mail. I believe the MP was in Parliament and unlikely to disturb him while on the phone in her office. It does mean that she would not be receiving any emails or letters regarding UK Docks from the time we finished the call. |
| 09-Jan | Respons to request to give my home phone number to Mr Palmer |
| 08-Jan | Request from Office Manager of MP for South Shields.permission to give my home phone number to a Mr Palmer |
| 00-Mon | Blank |