Shed and Corruption – Part 8: Misusing CA to Misinform

Misdirection No 9.

In February 2021, the 3rd, I wrote to the Newcastle Chronicle/Journal group and a day later thought I should advise Nicola Robason that I had done so and attached a copy of ‘An Aversion to Retrospective Planning’ which in turn referred to ‘Conflation of Complaints’ and the reason I did this was to warn Nicola that I has done so. I did it because I suspect people have been asking about the shed and being told that I was only repeating allegations.

9

The first of the documents missing from the list that Alison gave to Paula Abbott for the April the 29th 2021 and Customer Advocacy knew that I had been promised a reply to the Conflation of Complaints by the Monitoring Officer.

It appears from here that some in the Executive of the Council did not want to her to respond and ordered a reinstatement of their policy which included the allegation made by a Council’s Corporate Lead nearly five years before, 5-Oct-16:- “I am writing to advise you that my current view is that your behaviour in respect of this complaint is unreasonable

It look likes Hayley has discovered, that like the Ombudsman, she had been told a pack of lies and may I remind you that it is not unreasonable to say that the shed is 3m taller than planned when it is nearly 3m taller than planned, and put her foot down so you have been asked to misapply ‘Complaints Policy 2019v1.5’ as she is no longer prepared to do it.

It looks like coercive control to me and you have my commiserations.

Yours sincerely

Michael Dawson

This entry was posted in Abuse of Complaints System, Corruption, Misconduct. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.